Civil & Commercial Law · Deep dive
How commercial mediation works
Mediation resolves most commercial disputes that would otherwise head to court — confidentially, in weeks rather than years, and on terms the parties design themselves. Here is how the process actually runs.
Commercial mediation is a structured negotiation run by a neutral mediator. Nothing said in the room can be used in court, the parties keep control of the outcome, and the great majority of mediated disputes settle on the day or shortly after. Chambers works both sides of the process: appearing as counsel for parties in mediations, and — through Brett Harris, a qualified commercial mediator since 2008 — accepting appointments as mediator.
What mediation is (and is not)
Mediation is confidential and without prejudice. The mediator does not decide anything — they manage a structured negotiation, test each side's position in private, and help the parties find the deal that is genuinely available. If no agreement is reached, nothing said in the mediation can be used in later proceedings, and everyone's litigation rights are preserved.
That is the fundamental difference from arbitration or court: in mediation the parties keep control. No outcome is imposed. A settlement only happens if both sides sign it — which is exactly why settlements reached at mediation tend to stick.
- Confidential and without prejudice — protected from later use in court
- The mediator facilitates; the parties decide
- No settlement is binding until it is signed
- Litigation rights are fully preserved if it does not settle
When mediation is required or expected
Many commercial contracts contain a dispute-resolution clause requiring the parties to mediate before they can arbitrate or sue — and the courts will generally hold parties to that bargain. Even without a clause, the courts actively expect parties to attempt settlement: case management directions routinely build in ADR, and a party who unreasonably refuses to mediate can face costs consequences at the end of the proceeding.
The practical upshot is that mediation is rarely a question of "whether" — it is a question of when, and of arriving properly prepared.
- Contract ADR clauses commonly make mediation a precondition
- Courts build settlement steps into case management
- Unreasonable refusal to mediate can carry costs consequences
- Timing is strategic — early enough to save costs, late enough to know the case
How a mediation day runs
Before the day, each party typically provides the mediator with a position paper and the key documents, and signs a mediation agreement covering confidentiality and costs. The day itself usually opens with a joint session — each side states its position — before the mediator moves the parties into separate rooms and shuttles between them in private caucuses.
The caucuses are where the real work happens. The mediator stress-tests each side's case in private, carries offers between the rooms, and narrows the gap. Most commercial mediations resolve in a single day; complex multi-party disputes sometimes run longer or adjourn for information to be exchanged.
- Position papers and a mediation agreement before the day
- Joint opening session, then private caucuses
- The mediator shuttles offers and reality-tests each side privately
- Most commercial mediations resolve within a day
Making the settlement binding
A mediated deal becomes binding when it is recorded in a signed settlement agreement — usually drafted and signed before anyone leaves. From that point it is an enforceable contract, and if proceedings are already on foot they are discontinued or resolved by consent on the agreed terms.
Getting the drafting right in the room matters. Payment terms, timing, confidentiality, releases, and what happens on default all need to be nailed down while everyone is still at the table — a "heads of agreement to be finalised later" is where settlements come unstuck.
- The signed settlement agreement is an enforceable contract
- Existing proceedings are discontinued or resolved by consent
- Releases, default terms and confidentiality belong in the room, not later
When mediation is not the right tool
Mediation assumes two parties genuinely looking for a resolution. It is less suited to cases where one side needs urgent court intervention — an injunction to freeze assets or stop conduct — where a legal precedent is genuinely required, or where there is such an imbalance of power or good faith that a negotiated outcome would not hold.
In those cases arbitration under the Arbitration Act 1996, expert determination, or proceedings remain the right path — and preparing for them well is itself the best settlement lever.
- Urgency and injunctions need the court, not a mediator
- Precedent-setting disputes may need a judgment
- Bad faith or serious power imbalance undermines the process
- Arbitration and expert determination are the binding private alternatives
Mediator or counsel — chambers does both
Brett Harris qualified as a commercial mediator in Sydney in 2008 and accepts appointments as mediator in commercial disputes — bringing a litigator's read of how each side's case would actually fare at trial into the room.
Where chambers acts as counsel instead, the job is preparation: knowing the file cold, setting a realistic settlement range before the day, and negotiating from a position of trial-readiness. The parties who settle well at mediation are the ones who arrive ready not to.
- Brett Harris — qualified commercial mediator (Sydney, 2008)
- Available by appointment as mediator in commercial disputes
- Counsel-assisted representation for parties attending mediation
- Trial-ready preparation drives the best settlement terms
Common Questions
Civil & Commercial Law FAQs.
A few civil & commercial law-specific answers. See the full FAQ →
Make an Enquiry
Tell us briefly about your matter and we'll direct your enquiry to the right barrister at Wakatipu Chambers.